GovernSmyrna.

License and Variance Board Meeting - A. MAX BACON CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS — Minutes

Open official source ↗ · Source page 2

SHA-256 9d1e3e7bd1daf860cfb22a8a71901164dcfc6261edc157932989b2c704ac07b2 · Captured source extract

 
July 23, 2025 
10:00 AM 
 
City of Smyrna 
License and Variance Board Meeting 
2800 King Street SE 
Council Chambers 
 
Page 2 of 6 
 
The property is currently occupied by a one-story 2,130 square foot single-family home 
with a 216 square foot shed in the rear. A 20-foot sanitary sewer easement intersects the 
rear yard roughly 120 feet from the rear of the home. Due to a nearby stream, a portion of 
the rear yard is also encumbered by the State’s 25-foot stream buffer, the City’s 50-foot 
undisturbed stream buffer, and the City’s 75-foot impervious surface setback. 
  
The applicant is proposing to install a one-car 430 square foot metal carport on the side of 
the home. The carport will house the applicant’s Airstream RV and provide protection to 
the vehicle during inclement weather. Per the applicant, the carport is not to be used for 
storage nor be fully enclosed; the northern side of the carport will be closed off for both 
privacy and aesthetics, as this side faces the existing church. 
  
The accessory structure ordinance allows one accessory structure or use per lot and 
since a shed is already on the property, a variance is required for the carport. Since the 
shed and carport offer different uses for the property, the hardship is not self-created. 
  
The carport will be accessed off the existing driveway, which will be partially expanded to 
reach the new carport. The existing driveway is currently 3.1 feet off the northern side 
property line, which will continue with the expansion. This condition has existed on the 
property since at least 2009 per Cobb County GIS aerials with no detriment to surrounding 
neighbors. 
  
Due to the existing concrete driveway, the most logical area to construct the detached 
carport is within the northern side setback to decrease disturbance to the subject property 
and surrounding neighbors. Thus, the applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the 
northern side setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet. The existing home, originally built in 1955 
(prior to the current Zoning Code of 1974), currently sits in the middle of the lot, slightly 
catty-corner to the property lines, causing a portion of the home to encroach into the 10-
foot southern side setback line by roughly 3 feet. Since the existing home is near both 
side setbacks already, there is no additional room to add any type of covered parking 
space within the side setbacks without moving the structure to the middle of the lot and 
drastically increasing the amount of driveway required. Thus, the hardship is not self-
created. Additionally, although the structure will be within 5 feet of the side property line, 
since the structure will be metal, no additional stipulations are required to meet fire 
retardation requirements per the Residential Building Code. 
  
Community Development believes the variances are the minimum variances needed to 
provide additional covered parking on the subject property, as any addition in line with the 
existing home would require a variance. At the time of this report, Community 
Development has not received any opposition to the requests. 
  
The applicant is requesting to deviate from the development standards established by the 
City for the side setback, driveway setbacks, and maximum number of accessory 
structures. According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be 
reviewed under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or 
extraordinary circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is 
self-created by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application 
of the relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the 
property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. After a 
review of the standards above, Community Development believes that the variances will 
not adversely affect surrounding residents; therefore, staff recommends approval of the 
requested variances with the following condition: