GovernSmyrna.

License and Variance Board Meeting - Council Chambers — Minutes

Open official source ↗ · Source page 2

SHA-256 a1dff9e18bbda8e8668c3e36b2d09c84653f843aeb84e2d2265fb6ef7a441e81 · Captured source extract

 
July 22, 2026 
10:00 AM 
 
City of Smyrna 
License and Variance Board Meeting 
2800 King Street SE 
Council Chambers 
 
Page 2 of 5 
 
The applicant is requesting to retain the full kitchen within the basement to include a 
refrigerator, dishwasher, and stovetop range. The homeowner has finished the basement 
to include a full bedroom, bathroom, family area, and kitchen when completed. The 
basement is to be used as entertainment space for family and is not to be rented or 
occupied for gain. Section 402.24 of the Zoning Ordinance defines a dwelling unit as, “a 
building or portion thereof, designed, arranged and used for living quarters for one family 
only, but not including units in hotels or other such structures designed for transient 
residence. An individual bathroom and complete kitchen facilities, permanently installed, 
shall be contained within each dwelling unit.” City’s Zoning Code restricts one complete 
kitchen per single-family dwelling; therefore, a variance is needed to retain the second 
kitchen in the basement of the home. 
  
The finished basement will appear as part of the main structure and will not be divided by 
any fire wall. Additionally, there is limited access to the basement door from the outside, 
which is only accessed from the rear via a moderate slope. Thus, the addition could not 
easily be converted to a separate rental unit by future owners. 
  
Were it not for the kitchen, no other variances would be needed to finish the basement. 
Community Development has been supportive of similar variances where the second 
kitchen has been proposed for family only and where the second kitchen could not easily 
be converted into a rental unit or duplex. Furthermore, similar variances have been 
approved nearby in the Vinings Estates and Enclave at Cooper Lake subdivisions. These 
previous variances have been for homes of similar size and type with no known detriment 
to the surrounding areas. 
  
The applicant has requested a variance to permit a second kitchen in a single-family 
home. According to Section 1403 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances must be reviewed 
under the following standards: (1) Whether there are unique and special or extraordinary 
circumstances applying to the property; (2) Whether any alleged hardship is self-created 
by any person having an interest in the property; (3) Whether strict application of the 
relevant provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of the 
property; and (4) Whether the variance proposed is the minimum variance needed. After a 
review of the standards above, Community Development believes that the second kitchen 
will not adversely affect surrounding residents, nor set a negative precedent for future 
homebuilding in the area. Community Development recommends approval of the 
requested variance with the following stipulations:  
 
1. Approval of the requested variance is conditioned upon substantial compliance 
with the floor plans submitted with the variance application. 
2. The basement shall not be rented or occupied for gain, except as permitted in 
Article IX of Chapter 22 as it pertains to the operation of short-term rental units. 
3. These conditions shall run in perpetuity with the property and as such are also 
applicable to any future owner. 
 
Chairperson Jones asked how the city learned about the kitchen that had not been 
submitted for a variance. Ms. Crowe stated that it was discovered at final inspection. 
When inspectors arrived, it did not match the plans that had been submitted.   
  
Vikram Bollineni, applicant, came forward. Chairperson Jones asked Mr. Bollineni how the 
plans submitted did not include the kitchen. Mr. Bollineni explained that it was a timing 
issue. There were so many delays along with not understanding how the variance process 
worked. Once the stone was installed, it triggered the variance requirement. Mr. Jones 
asked what the intent of the second kitchen is. Mr. Bollineni stated it is for his growing 
son, visiting friends, and visiting family. It will not be used as a rental. He stated that the