GovernSmyrna.

License and Variance Board Meeting - A. MAX BACON CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS — Minutes

Open official source ↗ · Source page 4

SHA-256 de9e3197bc015e87a7ef92e3bdb031a716d0f2ac29b123367e924d737d84a914 · Captured source extract

 
February 12, 2025 
10:00 AM 
 
City of Smyrna 
License and Variance Board Meeting 
2800 King Street SE 
Council Chambers 
 
Page 4 of 5 
 
Since the property was platted in 1998, prior to the Stream Buffer Protection Ordinance in 
2005, the hardship is not self-created. No other variances are needed as the property is 
below their impervious coverage maximum of 45% and will be within the building 
setbacks. 
  
Since the Stormwater Ordinance does not differentiate between replaced and new 
impervious area, a variance is required for the nonconforming stream buffer 
encroachment. Additionally, per Section 1102, “no nonconforming building, structure or 
use shall be extended, nor shall its total value be enhanced, unless such extensions or 
alterations conform with the provisions of this ordinance.” Since the screened porch is 
replacing the previously open deck, the property no longer remains legally nonconforming. 
However, since the existing single-family home and deck were already non-conforming, 
the hardship is not self-created. 
  
The original stream buffer encroachment occurred in 1999 when the home and deck were 
built and the additional deck square footage amounts to less than 100 square feet of new 
impervious material, which is considered minor land disturbance. Thus, the Engineering 
Department has determined that no remediation is required in order to support the 
variance. 
  
Due to the existing stream buffers encumbering the entirety of the rear yard and a portion 
of the existing home, Community Development believes this is the minimum variance 
needed to allow for any deck replacement and that there should be no negative impacts to 
adjacent properties if approved. Strict application of the ordinance would deny the 
applicant the ability to replace the deck as-is due to the stream buffer location. At the time 
of this report, Community Development has not received any calls in opposition to the 
request. 
  
The applicant is requesting relief from the City’s 50-foot undisturbed stream buffer to 
rebuild a deck in the rear yard. According to Section 46-160 of the Stream Buffer 
Protection Ordinance, variances must be reviewed under the following standards: (1) The 
shape, size, topography, slope, soils, vegetation and other physical characteristics of the 
property; (2) The locations of all streams on the property, including along property 
boundaries; (3) The location and extent of the proposed buffer or setback intrusion; (4) 
Whether alternative designs are possible which require less intrusion or no intrusion; (5) 
The long-term and construction water-quality impacts of the proposed variance; (6) 
Whether as a result of an exchange of buffer area the net buffer area is not reduced; and 
(7) Whether issuance of the variance is at least as protective of natural resources and the 
environment. After a review of the standards above, Community Development and the 
Engineering Department believe that the encroachment will not adversely affect 
surrounding residents nor the existing stream; therefore, staff recommend approval of the 
requested variance with the following condition:  
 
1. Approval of the requested variance shall be conditioned upon substantial 
compliance with the site plan and elevations submitted with the variance 
application. 
 
Amy Cunningham, homeowner, came forward and stated that they want to update the 
rotting deck and screen it in. She stated she understands the stipulation read into record. 
  
A public hearing was called, and no one came forward in favor of or in opposition to this 
item.