RFP 26-016 Addendum 1
Open official source ↗ · Source page 4
On the Atlanta side it is preferred, but not required that the bridge will connect to the Chattahoochee Brick Company site. 24. Do the alternative alignments for Task 3 include the approximately three miles of the main stem trail on the Smyrna/Cobb County side of the Chattahoochee River and/or the six miles of the main stem trail on the Atlanta/Fulton County side? Or are we just examining potential tie-in points to the main stem (Preferred Alignment) trails on both sides of the river from the 2020 Chattahoochee RiverLands Study? Tie in points for the main steam trails only. 25. If the alternatives analysis is to include the main stem trail mileage on the Smyrna/Cobb County and Atlanta/Fulton County sides of the Chattahoochee River, is the expectation that the preferred alignment also be advanced to 30% design/Preliminary Design? Unknown. 26. Will any Bonds be required including Performance and Payments Bonds? If YES, we will not be able to enter into or execute an agreement that requires us to provide a performance bond because they are not applicable to the services. No 27. Can you confirm the anticipated or preferred corridor boundary to use for the feasibility study? Do you have a kmz file of this area? Not answered, unavailable. 28. Will the City provide existing GIS layers? Yes 29. CERM can perform the survey deliverable - Is a full boundary survey required, or only a topographic and features survey as defined in the RFP deliverable list? Not answered. 30. Need clarification on the Geotech scope – ex. What is the expected number of borings per alignment? Unknown. 31. Will the City please confirm that subconsultants are only required to submit the Subconsultant Affidavit and Agreement? Yes, any other subconsultant documents will be completed by the awarded firm. 32. May graphics and photos be placed in the appendix? Yes 33. If the City issues any substantial changes through an addendum, will an extension of the proposal due date be provided? There are no substantial changes. 34. Can the City confirm that proposals should be formatted to reflect the "Contents of Proposal" structure outlined on page 12? Yes.